Followup

The last point I wanted to make about the MIT incident (post from two days ago) is that while many people want to cite ethics as a justification for firing someone obviously caught in a lie, at what point do we take a look at those who do the accusing? Wasn't it Newt Gingrich who led the charge against Bill Clinton citing that his "fling" with Monica Lewinsky merited impeachment? And oh yes...wasn't Gingrich having an affair while leading that charge? Some would say that's the pot calling the kettle black. So when it come to the story of Marilee and MIT, should she really have been fired for lying ten years ago on a resume? In this particular case I don't believe so. From all accounts, she was doing a great job. The punishment does not fit the alleged "crime".

On a separate note, somehow I managed to send email to someone who should not have received it. I could have sworn I went through all of my contact lists so that very thing could not occur. Apparently I missed one (probably because it's a variation of a list that I hardly use). Oh well...accidents happen. Can't worry about what the recipient thinks. All I could do was say sorry for the wayward email and keep it moving. No biggie. Just don't want some dude thinking that i'm thinking about him when i'm not. ..especially when he basically didn't even want to give me the time of day. You know how guys are. Don't sweat the small stuff Ang. O.K. It's late. I better go to sleep. More later in the morning...it's Tuesday! Good deal!